This Custom-Made 8x10 Digital Back Costs "As Much As a Good-Sized House" | Popular Photography

This Custom-Made 8x10 Digital Back Costs "As Much As a Good-Sized House"

Mitchell Feinberg had this custom back built to combat the rising costs of 8x10 Polaroids

8x10 back

8x10 back

When we saw the custom 8x10 digital back being used by renowned product photographer, Mitchell Feinberg over on the excellent A Photo Editor blog we couldn't help but be intrigued, especially when we found out (roughly) how much it cost to produce.

After spending months on technical research, he finally tracked down a manufacturer willing to listen to his admittedly difficult request, and create a sensor that would click into the back of his camera. The first prototype was made in February of 2009, and nine months later he had a fully functional sensor with an 8x10 capture area that would snap in place to his Sinar camera.

To help add some scale to that 8x10 number, consider the fact that it's (very) roughly 60-times the size of a full-frame DSLR sensor. That makes it about 90-times the size of the typical APS-C sensor. That's big.

Nicknamed the Maxback, Feinberg got two of them made so that he could have a backup for a price he calls "equal to the cost of a good size house – before the housing crash." Each unit would go for around "low six figures" if more were to be made, but at that price point and with a very specific purpose, it's unlikely these will ever go for sale.

The most interesting thing? Feinberg doesn't use the back for the final images — he uses it as a digital preview of the final shot so as to save on film. In fact, the final resolution isn't high enough for full-on print spreads. With the digital back in place, he can take an image in just 30 seconds, and then when he's happy with the setup, he can swap in the film and shoot a couple of sheets — which allows him to keep the image quality that he loved from the original, and save on the $15/shot film, of which he estimates he shoots more than 3,000 per year.

We reached out to Feinberg to get some more technical info on his shooting setup. Tuned to ISO 100, it runs on a custom blend of software and scripts to control the back, transmit the information to a computer, and then show it for a preview:

We developed proprietory PC software to run the back. The software has menus for integration time (or automatic if you want the lens shutter to control it), light source type, and timed power down, as well as a dialog box to indicate where the files should be saved. I'm a Mac guy, so I have the software write the image file directly to a networked Mac. I wrote a script that watches the Mac folder. It opens the 16bit RGB images in photoshop, where the image is rotated as needed, cropped, adjusted with a gamma curve, and then transfered to Lightroom. I use Lightroom for viewing and archiving. The whole process is completely hands free and usually takes about 25 seconds; the image needs no further processing once in LR, except for slight grey balance tweaks.

We highly recommend you read the full APE post, but don't hold us responsible if it gives you the insatiable urge to go out and try large format film shooting.

Latest


More Stories


Videos