The first lens in a promised line of AT-X Pro FX full-frame Tokinas, this is also the company’s first with a highly refined, micro AF motor that’s both silent and fast-focusing. Approximately a 26–45mm equivalent on Canon’s APS-C bodies and 24–42mm on Nikon’s-—the only mounts in which it’s available—this $850 (street) lens zooms and focuses internally for a completely stationary barrel.
This barrel is large and quite heavy. (To compare, in 2008 we called Canon’s 16–35mm f/2.8L II, which is 12 ounces lighter, “tank-like.”) It’s nicely finished with gold accents and a fixed hood. Unlike most internal-focusing lenses, this Tokina doesn’t offer full-time manual focus. But in use it feels close to that norm, thanks to the smooth-turning MF ring, which doubles as a push/pull-type MF/AF switch. The zoom turn, although even, feels stiff, and the new DC motor makes the AF action fast and very close to silent.
On our Test Lab’s optical bench, the lens produced Excellent-range sharpness and contrast. Its SQF numbers were significantly stronger than those of the 16–35mm f/4 VR Nikkor, especially in the middle of the zoom range.
Its most remarkable strength? An unparalleled ability to control distortion. DxO Analyzer 3.2 tests found only Imperceptible distortion across the focal lengths. No lens this wide has come this close to distortion-free imaging in recent memory—the comparable Canon’s distortion was Slight to Visible at the wide end. Equally remarkable: The Tokina produced no edge falloff at any focal length.
Its 1.75X zoom range is a bit stingy, and the lens is not image-stabilized—significant because neither Canon nor Nikon offers sensor-based stabilization in their DSLR bodies.
Nonetheless, with nearly flawless optics, this lens is in a lofty class by itself. Here’s hoping all the future AT-X Pro FX glass is as strong.
SPECIFICATIONS:
16–28MM (16.47–27.32mm tested), f/2.8 (2.55–2.94 tested), 15 elements in 13 groups. Focus ring turns 80°. Zoom ring turns 60°. Focal lengths marked at 16-, 20-, 24-, and 28mm.
DIAGONAL VIEW ANGLE: 107–76 degrees.
WEIGHT: 2.21 lb.
FILTER SIZE: Doesn’t accept threaded filters.
MOUNTS: Canon AF, Nikon AF
STREET PRICE: $850.
TEST RESULTS:
DISTORTION: At 16mm, 0.04% (Imperceptible) barrel. At 24mm, 0.02% (Imperceptible) pincushion. At 28mm, 0.02% (Imperceptible) pincushion.
LIGHT FALLOFF: At 16mm, none. At 24mm, none. At 28mm, none.
CLOSE-FOCUSING DISTANCE: 10.16 inches.
MAXIMUM MAGNIFICATION RATIO: At 16mm, 1:7.18. At 24mm, 1:4.89. At 28mm, 1:4.25.
Great work by Tokina. Looking forward to future lenses based on this excellent performance. That being said, I'm glad my 'tank like' Canon 16-35 f2.8L II weighs so much less, takes regular screw on filters, has the missing 28-35 portion of the zoom range, has similar distortion control on almost all zoom lengths. Plus it has a perfect sunstar with very little aberrations of any kind. So much for the Tokina being in a class of it's own I guess.
Looks also very "Pentaxian" in the design.
Another good example of their collaboration?
Nobody mentioned the price. At $900 streeet, this lens is definitely in a class of its own.
I'd like to know how this lens compares to the highly regarded Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8, especially regarding flare, which the Nikkor is noted for. With a bulbous front element, I would think this Tokina would also be prone to it.
How can anyone use this UWA for landscapes, when it can't even accept filters? It's so frustrating to have a nice UWA for FF, but with a non-removable hood...
Great work by Tokina. Looking forward to future lenses based on this excellent performance. That being said, I'm glad my 'tank like' Canon 16-35 f2.8L II weighs so much less, takes regular screw on filters, has the missing 28-35 portion of the zoom range, has similar distortion control on almost all zoom lengths. Plus it has a perfect sunstar with very little aberrations of any kind. So much for the Tokina being in a class of it's own I guess.
Looks also very "Pentaxian" in the design.
Another good example of their collaboration?
Nobody mentioned the price. At $900 streeet, this lens is definitely in a class of its own.
I'd like to know how this lens compares to the highly regarded Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8, especially regarding flare, which the Nikkor is noted for. With a bulbous front element, I would think this Tokina would also be prone to it.
How can anyone use this UWA for landscapes, when it can't even accept filters? It's so frustrating to have a nice UWA for FF, but with a non-removable hood...