Close

Member Login

Invalid username or password.
Incorrect Login. Please try again.

Not a member?

Sign up and join a community that's passionate about exploring the world of photography.

Tested: Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX

Great work by Tokina. Looking forward to future lenses based on this excellent performance. That being said, I'm glad my 'tank like' Canon 16-35 f2.8L II weighs so much less, takes regular screw on filters, has the missing 28-35 portion of the zoom range, has similar distortion control on almost all zoom lengths. Plus it has a perfect sunstar with very little aberrations of any kind. So much for the Tokina being in a class of it's own I guess.

0 Good Comment? yes no

Looks also very "Pentaxian" in the design.
Another good example of their collaboration?

0 Good Comment? yes no

Nobody mentioned the price. At $900 streeet, this lens is definitely in a class of its own.

0 Good Comment? yes no

I'd like to know how this lens compares to the highly regarded Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8, especially regarding flare, which the Nikkor is noted for. With a bulbous front element, I would think this Tokina would also be prone to it.

0 Good Comment? yes no

How can anyone use this UWA for landscapes, when it can't even accept filters? It's so frustrating to have a nice UWA for FF, but with a non-removable hood...

0 Good Comment? yes no

Comments (5)

Write a comment

Great work by Tokina. Looking forward to future lenses based on this excellent performance. That being said, I'm glad my 'tank like' Canon 16-35 f2.8L II weighs so much less, takes regular screw on filters, has the missing 28-35 portion of the zoom range, has similar distortion control on almost all zoom lengths. Plus it has a perfect sunstar with very little aberrations of any kind. So much for the Tokina being in a class of it's own I guess.

0 Good Comment? yes no

Looks also very "Pentaxian" in the design.
Another good example of their collaboration?

0 Good Comment? yes no

Nobody mentioned the price. At $900 streeet, this lens is definitely in a class of its own.

0 Good Comment? yes no

I'd like to know how this lens compares to the highly regarded Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8, especially regarding flare, which the Nikkor is noted for. With a bulbous front element, I would think this Tokina would also be prone to it.

0 Good Comment? yes no

How can anyone use this UWA for landscapes, when it can't even accept filters? It's so frustrating to have a nice UWA for FF, but with a non-removable hood...

0 Good Comment? yes no
Post a Comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
(200 Characters or less)
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
All submitted comments are subject to the license terms set forth in our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use