|
|
|
|
Hands On: Canon EOS 60D
You don’t have to search far to find an overriding theme for Canon in 2010: high-definition video. Every new DSLR introduced by the company this year has included it, and the new EOS 60D ($1099, body only) is no exception.
While the new camera has the same video capabilities as the EOS 7D ($1,545, street, body only) and EOS Rebel T2i ($800, street, body only), the models above and below it in the lineup, it also includes a first for a Canon DSLR—a 3-inch, tilting and swiveling LCD with 1.04 million dots. This articulated screen makes it far easier to follow action during video capture and to shoot stills with the camera in unusual positions.
We spent several days shooting with a preproduction sample on a visit to Yellowstone National Park, hosted by Canon, and got a good sense of how the camera handles and what you can expect from it in day-to-day use. But because its firmware, the software built into every camera, was not yet in final form at press time, we have not been able to subject the 60D to the rigors of the Popular Photography Test Lab. We’ll update you as soon as we can get a final production sample.
It's too bad the 60D isn't an upgrade to the 50D... slow, plastic upgrade for the rebel line it looks like. :(
I will wait for the replacement model of Nikon D90.
Swiveling LCD with 7D features of HD movie. Its just WOW at this price. Only thing to see is how it works in real world tests. If one can overlook certain things, this body should rock.
Seems Nikon is yet to uncover some surprises, :)
Regards,
Magic Shutters
THIS IS A "ME-TOO" CAMERA.
NOTHING NEW.
The message is now clear, former x0D user, if you want an upgrade-- move up to the 7D.
Its a shame there wasn't more innovation in this body than the articulated screen. Though frankly, I prefer slow, steady, and proven versus the feature-free-for-all that seems to be happening in Alpha- and 4/3rds land this year.
From here on there won't be anymore huge leaps in camera technology aside from the HD video capabilities; at least in the DSLR sector.
I'm really glad I opted for the 7D. I like the fact that it has dual Digic processors, and I'm really impressed by the 100% viewfinder.
I think that the 60D is only a better dressed 50D and that seems like the only real feature set other the addition of HD video in the new full size body.
As an owner of a Canon 20D and a 40D [20D is a better Camera] am waiting for Canon to Bring out a Quality "No Frills" DSLR Camera. Do We really need all the Differant Modes, Video, Live View Etc.
I will wait for some tests but for now, Phil took some very good pictures at yellow stone. I like his work...and hope to learn from him
I agree with wittaman1, below; either it's a still camera or a video camera. A quality Still camera is what I would prefer; I have point and shoot that do great video, but I do like the Live View feature for studio work. Canon, bring out a pro full frame camera (such as the 5D Mk11) without the video and keep the price under $2K.
Still no continuous AF in video mode.... Looks like Nikon has jumped a step ahead.... Still looks like a good upgrade from 50D....
Dissappointing, I wanted a back up for my 5D2 and was hoping for better. No flash sync? Looks like a second hand 7D it is.
I am disappointed !
Is that all that Canon can come up with ?
Nothing innovative or new. SIGH !
I will get a Sony a55 or Panasonic GH2 instead.
8 ( 8 O
Makes more sense to look at this new camera as what it is, a bold repositioning of the camera line between the Rebel and 7D. Canon and Nikon offerings never purely line up anyway. It may attract buyers who don't flog their gear (be honest people, if you baby your camera and upgrade every two years, will, you miss the magnesium alloy?) and gives those pros who actually make a living with Rebels a modest upgrade and wireless flash control.
This is a good "preview review" that had some interesting things to say. However, I'm surprised that there was no comment about the 60D using SD cards instead of the CF cards of its predecessors. This will mean a significant additional expense for someone moving from the recent x0D models. For someone like me who often shoots 1,000-1,500 raw-format shots per day, this is a significant consideration in evaluating the cost of moving to either the 60D or the 7D.
HO HUM-Another model with mixed features. I guess the swivel screen is a good idea. The other features would not cause me to upgrade. I don't understand Canon's mind set producing another DSLR that can't compete with one of there current models the 7D.
Really people, this is an $1100 camera. I paid more than that for an HV20 video camera just three years ago. For your $1100 now you get a full-featured, kick-ass still camera that also shoots near-Hollywood quality video. No, it's not a 7D. It was never meant to be a replacement for a 7D. But it would be an ideal companion to a 7D. I find it very hard to believe that so many people are dissing such an amazing machine. Let's keep things in perspective, people. The only other cameras in this price range that can do what this machine does are ... uh, well, there aren't any.
There are several changes in the 60D which account for the price compared to the T2i:
There is no accounting for limited info on specs but you don't get to 5+ vs 3+ shots per second on an articulating screen alone. the sensors are the same size they report but the circuitry is different. thus the dual layer metering, cross hair points, and reportedly upgraded Digic 4 processor though the name hasn't been changed. Also the body is aluminum/plastic. There's hardly anything to complain about save the AF movie. But consider that the price is the same as the 50D on initial offering it's not bad.
I agree the D90 may have somethings to boast about but Nikon simply has fewer AF-S offerings for the photog who uses this category of camera.
No this may not be a steal but it is a good spec. Results will talk much louder with a good lens. Now if only Canon would drop the presumption of price down by 25%!
I see the Nikon fanboys are out in force here.:-)
When it comes to photography canon is considered as the finest tool for it, it seems a little expensive but the result is awesome.
When will Canon bring out the upgraded 1Ds Mark IV and stop spending all their time with small prosumer updates and give us a real full frame!
I personally am an owner of the trust and dependable 40D, which in my opinion outflanks the 50D, however after seeing some newer features, with the exception of still a plastic body, and video recording @ 11 minutes max still, and FPS dropped to 5.3 from the 50D's 6.3, i am going to go a ahead and buy me one upon release, for the simple fact, i like to have updated gear and this gives me good budgetary reason, over the 7D, which is beyond my price range, so Canon Kudos, i remain loyal!
thanks, and happy shooting ;)
I've been having a hard enough time trying to decide between the T2i and the 7D - the differences between the two didn't seem like they were huge. The extra continuous fps are nice, but not something that I think I'd use. The 19 point AF system and magnesium body are really the only significant differences I can see. Is that worth $800 more?
This model just complicates the decision for me. I don't see the point of it being positioned roughly halfway between the T2i and 7D. What market is it supposed to serve?
For me, the 60D embodies everything that is wrong with Canon recently:
1) Add more functions and capabilities, but take away direct external controls. Sounds like a recipe for slow, clumsy handling.
2) Forget about autofocus. Same 9-point diamond that started like in the EOS Elan 7/7E 35mm film SLRs about a decade ago. And though certainly the biggest instigator of DSLR video, no AF capability during movie mode.
3) Style over substance. How much money is lost on the various uniquely styled buttons on the back versus one button style? How much more useful information could fit on the top deck LCD were its top edge not angled?
4) Only one custom mode, despite the reduction in external controls which one would think might instead lead them to offer more custom modes.
5) No AF fine tuning, despite no apparently greater quality control that would lead to less lens sample variation.
6) HD Video. It's pretty clear that Canon intends to fully hybridize its cameras. However, the control and handling needs of each is quite different, and I don't want a video camera that takes stills (which is where Canon is headed), I want a still camera in which, at most, video is a tertiary consideration. There is SO much room for improvement in the stills specification, ergonomics and features of all the EOS cameras, I can't accept that their current iteration is where they likely will remain frozen in time as Canon focuses on video ergonomics, controls and styling.
I wish Canon well on the edge of their new frontier, and I hope Canon users get a lot of joy from their 60D and other Canon gear, but I'm getting off the EOS train at this station. I simply have no interest in the sacrifices necessary to get where it's going when there is so much yet to discover right here where I am already, at a price I am willing to pay.
I've been torn between buying a T2i and a 7D so I was intrigued by the introduction of this "between" model. Drove 100 miles yesterday to take a look at the 60D and overall was very impressed. Much more solid feel than the T2i which to me feels more like a toy than a serious camera. At the same time smaller and lighter than the 7D which quite frankly puts me literally in mind of it's namesake .... a canon. As a professional boat & wildlife photographer the idea of carrying that much weight around my neck for 10 hours days doesn't thrill me...
All in all I found the 60D a comfortable fit in all respects although not being able to actually use it to make images means that all I came away with was a sort of gut-level feel of having liked the camera.
One thing I found peculiar about this particular review was the bit about the center lock button on the mode control. Although I have bad arthritis and have never been know as nimble fingered I had absolutely no problem whatever in manipulating the dial while depressing the lock button with the same hand. And neither did either of the camera salesman who I talked with. Perhaps the reviewer has overly large hands or some other problem that made it difficult for him???
The 60D is a new Rebel upgrade being priced as a XXD Camera. The composite plastic body firmly places it in the Rebel line and not the XXD line. So we have to pay 400 or 500 more dollars because they changed the name catogories on these Cameras. I actually damaged a Rebel camera by leaving it on a front seat during a vacation trip. I minorly bumped it and a big chip of plastic broke off. I used the same camera in a snow storm, that ended the camera. Marketing the cheap Rebel body as an XXd camera is a huge rip-off!!!! Not mentioning this change in the review is also very disappointing reporting.
people~ dun judge so early... 60D is a repositioned camera not replacement...ur expectations do not mean the manufacturer's idea of making camera... if you have got money, but 1D or 5D... dun keep complaining.. I personally think this is a good camera~
I purchased a 60D with the 18-135 lens about 2 weeks ago and I've been quite happy with it so far. It fit my hand better than the T2i and it was cheaper than the 7D. While I liked the 7D's feature set, I wasn't willing to pay the extra price for. I'm happy with the purchase, and the images that have come out of it so far.
for me it's a good package, everything i need is in there. handy, HD video is cool, user friendly, speed is good enough, pixel is impressive, battery package as they say, last longer compared to 50D, the new tilting and swiveling 3 inches screen makes the difference and that really makes me love it.
I will purchase one if these, before the end of the year.
People.....stop dissing the plastic body. This Rebel Xt fell from the sky, and survived.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Digital-Camera-survives-a-sky-diving-crash
If you don't do extreme stuff like this, don't worry about it being magnesium. Ask yourself, when was the last time that magnesium body really showed what's it's made for?
I personally have been looking for exactly this camera, the 60D. I started with the Rebel many moons ago and ended up giving it to my son when he went off to college and upgraded to the 20D. After shooting with that for 2 years I then gave that to my daughter for college and moved onto the delicious but bulky heavy 5D Mark II. The 5D is the way to go if you shoot serious photos but again, it’s heavy and bulky and hard to lug overseas and through airports with all your equipment.
I was leaning towards getting a second camera eventually to use all the lenses that are not compatible with the 5D as I did not hand those over the my college kids. It’s coming up on 2 years since I got the 5D and if I don't add another lens to that I will upgrade to the 60D as soon as I see enough positive things said about it. I want something that isn't as bulky but has many of the same features. As for the plastic body to the heavy magnesium body...if you take care of your equipment and aren't accident prone then you should be fine. I've seen how my son is with his Rebel and I can tell you, it’s taken a heck of a lot of abuse with no problems.
I like the new flip out screen on the 60D also as I shoot with someone that has one on his camera and I adore that feature. Many times he is setting his camera on the ground or over a wall and can see what he is shooting as I am laying on my belly or squatting in an unflattering position to take the same photo, as for shooting over a wall, well, it’s next to impossible. I am drawn to the 60D so keep on speaking out how you feel about it so I can get a full feel for this camera before I jump in and make the purchase.
I like the new 60 D concept. It's about time Canon introduces a DSLR with the fold-out screen, like their G3 had 8 years ago! Why the hell did it take so long?!?
I'll be buying the Sony A55, because I already sold my Canon lenses to get a D5000, which was recently stolen, and the Sony A55 is a better value than the Canon 60 D. Besides, it shoots faster (10 fps) and has continuous auto-focus, like the Nikon D7000. One more nice thing about it is the fact that it includes GPS, so my image files will have location data embedded in them.
Someone above talked about having to buy SD cards. Get some Ridata microSDHC cards. They are $17 for an 8 GB class 6 card with free shipping from NewEgg.com. That is an insignificant expense ($50 for three) when compared to the $1,000 you'll be paying for the camera. If you shoot more than the three 8 GB cards can handle, then you'll be buying more hard drives anyway, so get yourself a couple extra 8 GB cards for $35 more, and you'll be fine. Yes, it's going to add 8% to your purchase cost, but them's the breaks kiddo!
Lets us unite and don't buy canon cameras I think they do not put effort to put the best possible feature in their camera. I think in that point they will lower their prices :)
I upgraded from a Rebel (used for 9 years) and 60D is perfect for an upgrade.
I have owned a D90, Recently I bought a new Canon EOS 60D with Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Lens. I really like it.
I've been using this in my real estate business, and I love the tilt screen. I was back and forth between the 60d and the T2i and then T3i, but for just a small bump up in price, I went with the 60d. Using this camera in video mode has been a huge step up from my Flip. Great camera, very pleased!
Brad Officer
Jacksonville short sale realtor
Compared to my hot and heavy 7D, this a real gem for beginners and amateurs.
All the benefits of Canon's new capabilities, Sensor quality, processor design and image output,
in a compact, well organized DSLR.
Amazing it costs just a thousand dollars.
My digital camera guide - http://www.eyalg.com
i have just recently upgrade to the 60d . i love the ease of use the video quality is great . i have done several shoots in low level light. i am very impressed the swivel screen has made my task much easier. good job canon...worth the wait and the money...
Copyright © 2012 Bonnier Corp. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
It's too bad the 60D isn't an upgrade to the 50D... slow, plastic upgrade for the rebel line it looks like. :(
I will wait for the replacement model of Nikon D90.
Swiveling LCD with 7D features of HD movie. Its just WOW at this price. Only thing to see is how it works in real world tests. If one can overlook certain things, this body should rock.
Seems Nikon is yet to uncover some surprises, :)
Regards,
Magic Shutters
THIS IS A "ME-TOO" CAMERA.
NOTHING NEW.
The message is now clear, former x0D user, if you want an upgrade-- move up to the 7D.
Its a shame there wasn't more innovation in this body than the articulated screen. Though frankly, I prefer slow, steady, and proven versus the feature-free-for-all that seems to be happening in Alpha- and 4/3rds land this year.
From here on there won't be anymore huge leaps in camera technology aside from the HD video capabilities; at least in the DSLR sector.
I'm really glad I opted for the 7D. I like the fact that it has dual Digic processors, and I'm really impressed by the 100% viewfinder.
I think that the 60D is only a better dressed 50D and that seems like the only real feature set other the addition of HD video in the new full size body.
As an owner of a Canon 20D and a 40D [20D is a better Camera] am waiting for Canon to Bring out a Quality "No Frills" DSLR Camera. Do We really need all the Differant Modes, Video, Live View Etc.
I will wait for some tests but for now, Phil took some very good pictures at yellow stone. I like his work...and hope to learn from him
I agree with wittaman1, below; either it's a still camera or a video camera. A quality Still camera is what I would prefer; I have point and shoot that do great video, but I do like the Live View feature for studio work. Canon, bring out a pro full frame camera (such as the 5D Mk11) without the video and keep the price under $2K.
Still no continuous AF in video mode.... Looks like Nikon has jumped a step ahead.... Still looks like a good upgrade from 50D....
Dissappointing, I wanted a back up for my 5D2 and was hoping for better. No flash sync? Looks like a second hand 7D it is.
I am disappointed !
Is that all that Canon can come up with ?
Nothing innovative or new. SIGH !
I will get a Sony a55 or Panasonic GH2 instead.
8 ( 8 O
Makes more sense to look at this new camera as what it is, a bold repositioning of the camera line between the Rebel and 7D. Canon and Nikon offerings never purely line up anyway. It may attract buyers who don't flog their gear (be honest people, if you baby your camera and upgrade every two years, will, you miss the magnesium alloy?) and gives those pros who actually make a living with Rebels a modest upgrade and wireless flash control.
This is a good "preview review" that had some interesting things to say. However, I'm surprised that there was no comment about the 60D using SD cards instead of the CF cards of its predecessors. This will mean a significant additional expense for someone moving from the recent x0D models. For someone like me who often shoots 1,000-1,500 raw-format shots per day, this is a significant consideration in evaluating the cost of moving to either the 60D or the 7D.
HO HUM-Another model with mixed features. I guess the swivel screen is a good idea. The other features would not cause me to upgrade. I don't understand Canon's mind set producing another DSLR that can't compete with one of there current models the 7D.
Really people, this is an $1100 camera. I paid more than that for an HV20 video camera just three years ago. For your $1100 now you get a full-featured, kick-ass still camera that also shoots near-Hollywood quality video. No, it's not a 7D. It was never meant to be a replacement for a 7D. But it would be an ideal companion to a 7D. I find it very hard to believe that so many people are dissing such an amazing machine. Let's keep things in perspective, people. The only other cameras in this price range that can do what this machine does are ... uh, well, there aren't any.
There are several changes in the 60D which account for the price compared to the T2i:
There is no accounting for limited info on specs but you don't get to 5+ vs 3+ shots per second on an articulating screen alone. the sensors are the same size they report but the circuitry is different. thus the dual layer metering, cross hair points, and reportedly upgraded Digic 4 processor though the name hasn't been changed. Also the body is aluminum/plastic. There's hardly anything to complain about save the AF movie. But consider that the price is the same as the 50D on initial offering it's not bad.
I agree the D90 may have somethings to boast about but Nikon simply has fewer AF-S offerings for the photog who uses this category of camera.
No this may not be a steal but it is a good spec. Results will talk much louder with a good lens. Now if only Canon would drop the presumption of price down by 25%!
I see the Nikon fanboys are out in force here.:-)
When it comes to photography canon is considered as the finest tool for it, it seems a little expensive but the result is awesome.
When will Canon bring out the upgraded 1Ds Mark IV and stop spending all their time with small prosumer updates and give us a real full frame!
http://www.gavinandersonphoto.co.uk/
I personally am an owner of the trust and dependable 40D, which in my opinion outflanks the 50D, however after seeing some newer features, with the exception of still a plastic body, and video recording @ 11 minutes max still, and FPS dropped to 5.3 from the 50D's 6.3, i am going to go a ahead and buy me one upon release, for the simple fact, i like to have updated gear and this gives me good budgetary reason, over the 7D, which is beyond my price range, so Canon Kudos, i remain loyal!
thanks, and happy shooting ;)
I've been having a hard enough time trying to decide between the T2i and the 7D - the differences between the two didn't seem like they were huge. The extra continuous fps are nice, but not something that I think I'd use. The 19 point AF system and magnesium body are really the only significant differences I can see. Is that worth $800 more?
This model just complicates the decision for me. I don't see the point of it being positioned roughly halfway between the T2i and 7D. What market is it supposed to serve?
For me, the 60D embodies everything that is wrong with Canon recently:
1) Add more functions and capabilities, but take away direct external controls. Sounds like a recipe for slow, clumsy handling.
2) Forget about autofocus. Same 9-point diamond that started like in the EOS Elan 7/7E 35mm film SLRs about a decade ago. And though certainly the biggest instigator of DSLR video, no AF capability during movie mode.
3) Style over substance. How much money is lost on the various uniquely styled buttons on the back versus one button style? How much more useful information could fit on the top deck LCD were its top edge not angled?
4) Only one custom mode, despite the reduction in external controls which one would think might instead lead them to offer more custom modes.
5) No AF fine tuning, despite no apparently greater quality control that would lead to less lens sample variation.
6) HD Video. It's pretty clear that Canon intends to fully hybridize its cameras. However, the control and handling needs of each is quite different, and I don't want a video camera that takes stills (which is where Canon is headed), I want a still camera in which, at most, video is a tertiary consideration. There is SO much room for improvement in the stills specification, ergonomics and features of all the EOS cameras, I can't accept that their current iteration is where they likely will remain frozen in time as Canon focuses on video ergonomics, controls and styling.
I wish Canon well on the edge of their new frontier, and I hope Canon users get a lot of joy from their 60D and other Canon gear, but I'm getting off the EOS train at this station. I simply have no interest in the sacrifices necessary to get where it's going when there is so much yet to discover right here where I am already, at a price I am willing to pay.
I've been torn between buying a T2i and a 7D so I was intrigued by the introduction of this "between" model. Drove 100 miles yesterday to take a look at the 60D and overall was very impressed. Much more solid feel than the T2i which to me feels more like a toy than a serious camera. At the same time smaller and lighter than the 7D which quite frankly puts me literally in mind of it's namesake .... a canon. As a professional boat & wildlife photographer the idea of carrying that much weight around my neck for 10 hours days doesn't thrill me...
All in all I found the 60D a comfortable fit in all respects although not being able to actually use it to make images means that all I came away with was a sort of gut-level feel of having liked the camera.
One thing I found peculiar about this particular review was the bit about the center lock button on the mode control. Although I have bad arthritis and have never been know as nimble fingered I had absolutely no problem whatever in manipulating the dial while depressing the lock button with the same hand. And neither did either of the camera salesman who I talked with. Perhaps the reviewer has overly large hands or some other problem that made it difficult for him???
The 60D is a new Rebel upgrade being priced as a XXD Camera. The composite plastic body firmly places it in the Rebel line and not the XXD line. So we have to pay 400 or 500 more dollars because they changed the name catogories on these Cameras. I actually damaged a Rebel camera by leaving it on a front seat during a vacation trip. I minorly bumped it and a big chip of plastic broke off. I used the same camera in a snow storm, that ended the camera. Marketing the cheap Rebel body as an XXd camera is a huge rip-off!!!! Not mentioning this change in the review is also very disappointing reporting.
people~ dun judge so early... 60D is a repositioned camera not replacement...ur expectations do not mean the manufacturer's idea of making camera... if you have got money, but 1D or 5D... dun keep complaining.. I personally think this is a good camera~
I purchased a 60D with the 18-135 lens about 2 weeks ago and I've been quite happy with it so far. It fit my hand better than the T2i and it was cheaper than the 7D. While I liked the 7D's feature set, I wasn't willing to pay the extra price for. I'm happy with the purchase, and the images that have come out of it so far.
for me it's a good package, everything i need is in there. handy, HD video is cool, user friendly, speed is good enough, pixel is impressive, battery package as they say, last longer compared to 50D, the new tilting and swiveling 3 inches screen makes the difference and that really makes me love it.
I will purchase one if these, before the end of the year.
People.....stop dissing the plastic body. This Rebel Xt fell from the sky, and survived.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Digital-Camera-survives-a-sky-diving-crash
If you don't do extreme stuff like this, don't worry about it being magnesium. Ask yourself, when was the last time that magnesium body really showed what's it's made for?
I personally have been looking for exactly this camera, the 60D. I started with the Rebel many moons ago and ended up giving it to my son when he went off to college and upgraded to the 20D. After shooting with that for 2 years I then gave that to my daughter for college and moved onto the delicious but bulky heavy 5D Mark II. The 5D is the way to go if you shoot serious photos but again, it’s heavy and bulky and hard to lug overseas and through airports with all your equipment.
I was leaning towards getting a second camera eventually to use all the lenses that are not compatible with the 5D as I did not hand those over the my college kids. It’s coming up on 2 years since I got the 5D and if I don't add another lens to that I will upgrade to the 60D as soon as I see enough positive things said about it. I want something that isn't as bulky but has many of the same features. As for the plastic body to the heavy magnesium body...if you take care of your equipment and aren't accident prone then you should be fine. I've seen how my son is with his Rebel and I can tell you, it’s taken a heck of a lot of abuse with no problems.
I like the new flip out screen on the 60D also as I shoot with someone that has one on his camera and I adore that feature. Many times he is setting his camera on the ground or over a wall and can see what he is shooting as I am laying on my belly or squatting in an unflattering position to take the same photo, as for shooting over a wall, well, it’s next to impossible. I am drawn to the 60D so keep on speaking out how you feel about it so I can get a full feel for this camera before I jump in and make the purchase.
I like the new 60 D concept. It's about time Canon introduces a DSLR with the fold-out screen, like their G3 had 8 years ago! Why the hell did it take so long?!?
I'll be buying the Sony A55, because I already sold my Canon lenses to get a D5000, which was recently stolen, and the Sony A55 is a better value than the Canon 60 D. Besides, it shoots faster (10 fps) and has continuous auto-focus, like the Nikon D7000. One more nice thing about it is the fact that it includes GPS, so my image files will have location data embedded in them.
Someone above talked about having to buy SD cards. Get some Ridata microSDHC cards. They are $17 for an 8 GB class 6 card with free shipping from NewEgg.com. That is an insignificant expense ($50 for three) when compared to the $1,000 you'll be paying for the camera. If you shoot more than the three 8 GB cards can handle, then you'll be buying more hard drives anyway, so get yourself a couple extra 8 GB cards for $35 more, and you'll be fine. Yes, it's going to add 8% to your purchase cost, but them's the breaks kiddo!
Lets us unite and don't buy canon cameras I think they do not put effort to put the best possible feature in their camera. I think in that point they will lower their prices :)
I upgraded from a Rebel (used for 9 years) and 60D is perfect for an upgrade.
I have owned a D90, Recently I bought a new Canon EOS 60D with Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS Lens. I really like it.
I've been using this in my real estate business, and I love the tilt screen. I was back and forth between the 60d and the T2i and then T3i, but for just a small bump up in price, I went with the 60d. Using this camera in video mode has been a huge step up from my Flip. Great camera, very pleased!
Brad Officer
Jacksonville short sale realtor
Compared to my hot and heavy 7D, this a real gem for beginners and amateurs.
All the benefits of Canon's new capabilities, Sensor quality, processor design and image output,
in a compact, well organized DSLR.
Amazing it costs just a thousand dollars.
My digital camera guide - http://www.eyalg.com
i have just recently upgrade to the 60d . i love the ease of use the video quality is great . i have done several shoots in low level light. i am very impressed the swivel screen has made my task much easier. good job canon...worth the wait and the money...