Review: A few months ago, I began a search for a 400mm ranged lens. I was able to narrow down my choices to the Canon 100-400mm IS and the Canon 400mm f5.6. I tested both lenses, looked at my budget, factored in how I’d use this lens and considered how each would impact my existing lenses. In the end I opted for the 400mm f5.6. After having used this lens for a few weeks, I’d like to share my experiences with this lens.
The off-white lens barrel, metal construction and sharp, UD glass represents the Canon “L” line well. The lens measures in at 10.1 inches, weighs 2.8 pounds and utilizes 77mm filters. It’s a light weight lens when compared to its big brother, the 400mm f4IS which comes in at 4.3 pounds.
It fits on the camera extremely well for its length and can easily be used without support. However, if you’re going to be shooting for extended periods of time, I would invest in a monopod or tripod. Even 2.8 pounds can start to feel heavy after about thirty minutes of shooting.
One feature I really like on the 400mm f5.6 is the retractable lens hood. It’s fixed to the lens barrel and easily slides into place. You’ll never leave home without it. The lens is also fitted with a tripod collar that is hinged. It can be taken on and off of the lens without having to remove the lens from the camera body; another feature that comes in handy.
I found the auto focus of this lens to be fast, it is one of the faster focusing lenses I’ve shot with. For those who prefer manual focus, the focus ring rotates smoothly and is comfortably positioned. I have not experienced any focusing problems with this lens such as hunting the subject in low light or being soft. I found this lens to be sharp throughout its aperture range and I’m really pleased with the overall image quality this lens produces.
At first, I was a little concerned about the 11.5 foot minimum focusing distance. Then again, with a 400mm lens, you’re not likely to set up on your subject 11.5 feet away. More times than not, the subject will easily exceed the 11.5 foot minimum. I’ve been using this lens mostly for bird photography and I have yet to meet a wild bird that would allow me to get anywhere near eleven feet of it. Would I like the minimum focus distance to be shorter? Yes, because there’s always a chance that you may sneak up on something that’s inside the 11 foot distance and not be able to capture the shot.
Can this lens be improved upon? Sure. The one feature that is noticeably missing is image stabilization. Should Canon ever renovate this thirteen year old lens, I am sure IS will be given strong consideration. However, if it doesn’t get fitted with IS, the lens is light enough to be used unsupported with little or no difficulty.
I have found this lens to be really good for bird photography and will look forward to using it on the little league baseball diamond come spring time. If you are looking for a sharp, quality built, fast focusing telephoto lens, the Canon 400mm f5.6L is an option to strongly consider.
|
