PopPhoto.com -- The online home of American Photo and Popular Photography & Imaging

Free Newsletter: Camera reviews,
lens tests, photo news and more!
September 05, 2008
Search

Subscribe

Popular Photography American Photo
Subscriptions/Customer Service

< Previous ArticleMore Photography Newswire Articles (99 of 315)Next Article >
Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Photo Gallery

Two Ways to Shoot a Landscape

Jim Richardson and J. Henry Fair show us their approach to landscape photography.


September 20, 2007


Two Ways to Shoot a Landscape
© Jim Richardson
Click photo to see more of Jim Richardson's images.

Perhaps no photographic genre is more popular than the landscape, and today there may be no more important one. The poignancy of the landscape -- fragile, beautiful, ever-changing, threatened -- has long called out to photographers.

And they have responded, driven by the urge to document, celebrate, and remember what they have seen. In that sense, all landscape photography is a kind of conservation photography. Here we take a look at how two very different people with two very different visions, Jim Richardson and J. Henry Fair, set out to photograph the lay of the land.

Jim Richardson Masterclass: The Flint Hills of Kansas

National Geographic photographer Jim Richardson has shot the Celtic lands of Cornwall, the architecture of Venice, and the whisky country of Scotland. But when he returns home, it is to Lindsborg, Kansas, that most American of places.

"Kansas is where I grew up, and it's where I choose to live," he says. "For me, no other place smells quite right, you know." Two years ago Richardson proposed a story for the magazine on the state's Flint Hills region, the last remaining expanse of tall grass prairie on the continent. But he knew going into the project that he was facing a photographic problem.

"It's a place I'd been back to many times in my career, and as a photographer I'd never done very well there," he says. "It is a prairie, and prairies are tough to shoot." The Flint Hills are simply rolling hills and grass, with few landmarks to place in the foreground to create a sense of depth. "Once you pick up a camera and point it at them, they just kind of diminish in the distance. They're not like the Tetons in Wyoming, which are big enough to fill a 4x5 frame."

Richardson's solution was to "work the story for all it's worth." A landscape is rarely successfully photographed in one day. "One of the things you do is to drive a hell of a lot of miles to find the place that has the look you envision," he says. Richardson had the advantage of a lengthy shooting schedule: He began work in March 2006 and didn't finish until late the following autumn. He was able to shoot as prairie chickens began their courting, or "booming," in early spring, and later in the summer, when ranchers burn off dead grasses in a man-made version of the natural prairie phenomenon that keeps nongrass vegetation from taking root. Still later he shot the intense regrowth period, when new grass turns the region emerald green.

The backing of National Geographic also allowed Richardson to hire a plane for aerial shots, but he essentially relied on his knowledge of the area to get the pictures he wanted. He knew that Kansas thunderstorms create a lot of visual drama, and he knew the back roads that led to little-known corners of the state. Most of all, he says, he remained alive to creative possibilities -- shooting lightning bugs over a field of wild alfalfa an hour after sunset, or creating a panoramic image of the Milky Way with four separate exposures.
-Jeffrey Elbies


Two Ways to Shoot a Landscape Next: J. Henry Fair Masterclass: Destruction from a Distance
1 | 2 Next


RELATED ARTICLES
Picturing Patti
Visa pour l'Image Preview
Matthew Rolston's Inspirations
A New Online Portfolio Option
Behind the Scenes on Hollywood's Biggest Movies


Search




Click to compare prices on photo equipment:


Newsletter Promo Button
Digital Days Promo Button
American Photo On Campus
Mentor Series Promo Button