

With the looks, but not the innards, of a classic rangefinder, Fujifilm’s FinePix X100 is sure to turn the head of any photo enthusiast. Once a camera lover finds out that this compact has an APS-C- sized 12.3MP CMOS sensor and a fast 35mm-equivalent f/2 Fujinon lens, curiosity will turn to expectations of topnotch image quality.
We know, because that’s exactly what happened to us. With the $1,200 (street) camera already heavily backordered at the time of introduction, we were quite eager to find out if this upscale compact lived up to its looks and specs. We came away impressed. The X100’s image quality, thanks in no small part to its large image sensor, is on a par with mid-level DSLRs. Plus, the shooting experience will please many of those who prefer traditional controls. Rangefinder purists, though, may find fault—the X100 isn’t, after all, a true rangefinder—and it has some quirks common to compact cameras that may leave advanced shooters reaching back in their bags for their high-end DSLRs.
In the Lab
With impressive resolving power for a 12.3MP sensor, some of the most accurate color reproduction we’ve seen, and commendable noise control, the X100 earned an Extremely High rating for overall image quality in the Popular Photography Test Lab.
Its Fujinon lens, with its aspheric element and high-refractive-index glass, no doubt contributed to the camera’s Extremely High rating in our resolution test. At 2260 lines per image height, it matched the result we saw from the Olympus Pen E-PL2, and was a smidgen shy of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2’s 2300 lines in the same test. Plus, the FinePix held onto that resolution as ISO increased. At ISO 6400, the X100 showed 2125 lines, while the GF2 fell to 2060 and the PL2 to 2010 at that high sensitivity.
The X100 also performed very well in our noise test, keeping it to acceptable levels all the way up to ISO 3200. Neither the Panasonic nor Olympus Micro Four Thirds cameras can match that. For that matter, the Fujifilm’s overall image quality tops that of the Sony Alpha NEX-5 and Samsung NX10, ILCs with APS-C-size sensors.
Now we need to point out one of the X100’s quirks. We always perform our lab tests on RAW images converted to TIFFs, using the manufacturer’s provided software, whenever possible. But at ISO 100 and ISO 12,800, the X100 captures JPEGs only—RAW is restricted to ISO 200–6400. Also, the software that came with the X100 didn’t include a RAW converter for Mac, though we were able to download a modified version of SilkyPix called RAW File Converter EX from the Fujfilm site—Apple users, take note.
Even before generating our test results for the X100, we were impressed by its color reproduction. Our lab tests proved its amazingly accurate colors, earning it an Excellent rating.
Since the X100’s lens is fixed, we also tested it for distortion and light falloff using DxO Analyzer 4.0. Even at its maximum aperture of f/2, it produced no vignetting. Distortion, though, was a mixed bag. Overall, it rated only Slight at 0.15%, but it showed complex distortion of the specific variety called moustache distortion—barrel in some areas and pincushion in others. At its worst, pincushion distortion reached Visible, 0.31%, mostly around the bottom edges of the frame, where it shouldn’t pose much of a problem for most shooting.
In the Field
There’s no denying that the FinePix X100 is one good-looking camera. More practically, though, its metal chassis and magnesium-alloy top and bottom plates lend a rugged heft, while the synthetic leather provides a nicely textured grip.
Meant to mimic a film camera, the X100’s controls are delightfully old-school, too. You set aperture by turning a ring to the rear of the lens barrel, and control shutter speed by using a dial atop the camera. In a nice touch, exposure compensation gets its own small dial too.
The benefit of this system is that you can set exposure manually while the camera is switched off and can always see the current state of the exposure settings easily.
The only missing part is ISO, which has neither a dial nor a dedicated button. But the tiny assignable function button next to the shutter release can be set to control ISO, which we did for nearly our entire field test.
As nostalgic as it is, the X100’s control system also has some downsides. Although changing apertures is easily accomplished with your left hand, it’s a bit of a stretch for the right. Also, while the aperture can be set in 1/3–stop increments, shutter speeds only click in whole steps. In aperture-priority mode, however, the camera can select intermediate speeds as needed.
By not having interchangeable lenses, the X100 falls strictly into the toy camera category, similar to the Yashicas, Canonettes and such of yesteryear. Part of the allure of having a Leica --and a real necessity for street photography in spite of what some purists might argue, is the ability to be able to employ several lenses. It is a pity that, for $1200, the X100 will not even give you that choice. The viewfinder is an excellent idea that should be copied by the GF's, PEN's and NEX's of the world, but all those cameras have interchangeable lenses and excellent zooms.
In the add following page 14 in the July issue, there is this statement: "The FinePix X100 provides smooth tonal rendering, an exceptionally low S/N ratio and outstanding image clarity." Why would I want a LOW Signal to Noise ratio?
This would be my perfect camera if it had dummy settings for dummies like me.
As many of its "problems" issued above, I can still see that camera in my bag!
Its not only a camera, but also a style&design stuff!
I'm sure its selling will be very good!
PEACE
http://www.moshesamuel.com
Sounds like a neat little camera. My only concern is the brand " Fujifilm ".
Can they be counted on to respond to a customer inquiry in case I drop it and want some repair information? I ask because my teenager purchased and thoroughly enjoyed using their FINEPIX Z70.It was her constant companion, then she dropped it. I thought that her dropping it would likely void the warranty as it was just a few months old. But I still wanted to get it fixed as it had been a great little camera. I called their repair dept. in Canada, left a message as they recommended, but did not hear back from them. Days later I left another message, still no response. I called again and spoke to a person who said customer service would help me, they did the same. I left a specific message about needing to know where to send it for repair, could someone at least tell me that, still no response. As I am telling this I realize I called even more than mentioned here. Can this company be counted on at all for help after you have purchased their product?
Has anyone else experienced this lack of concern? Any suggestions how to get their attention?
I've had my X100 for a couple of weeks now, and I love it more each time I use it. Handling seems natural, the electronic viewfinder is magic (Leica ought to do this), and the controls are all in the right places.
Image quality is superb. Colors are bright, details sharp and exposure is very smart. But I can over-ride the camera's setting just like my old Canon 7s.
The "quirk" of RAW being unavailable in the highest and lowest ISO simply indicates that those ISOs aren't available in the hardware and are made by under- or overexposing the RAW file and converting with the digital equivalent of push/pull in the camera's built-in JPEG engine. You can do exactly the same thing with a RAW converter, if you want. (Or perhaps better, just avoid those ISOs.)
@click2: I've had fine experiences with Fujifilm's repair centers in the US. Sorry to hear it's a problem in Canada.
By not having interchangeable lenses, the X100 falls strictly into the toy camera category, similar to the Yashicas, Canonettes and such of yesteryear. Part of the allure of having a Leica --and a real necessity for street photography in spite of what some purists might argue, is the ability to be able to employ several lenses. It is a pity that, for $1200, the X100 will not even give you that choice. The viewfinder is an excellent idea that should be copied by the GF's, PEN's and NEX's of the world, but all those cameras have interchangeable lenses and excellent zooms.
In the add following page 14 in the July issue, there is this statement: "The FinePix X100 provides smooth tonal rendering, an exceptionally low S/N ratio and outstanding image clarity." Why would I want a LOW Signal to Noise ratio?
This would be my perfect camera if it had dummy settings for dummies like me.
As many of its "problems" issued above, I can still see that camera in my bag!
Its not only a camera, but also a style&design stuff!
I'm sure its selling will be very good!
PEACE
http://www.moshesamuel.com
Sounds like a neat little camera. My only concern is the brand " Fujifilm ".
Can they be counted on to respond to a customer inquiry in case I drop it and want some repair information? I ask because my teenager purchased and thoroughly enjoyed using their FINEPIX Z70.It was her constant companion, then she dropped it. I thought that her dropping it would likely void the warranty as it was just a few months old. But I still wanted to get it fixed as it had been a great little camera. I called their repair dept. in Canada, left a message as they recommended, but did not hear back from them. Days later I left another message, still no response. I called again and spoke to a person who said customer service would help me, they did the same. I left a specific message about needing to know where to send it for repair, could someone at least tell me that, still no response. As I am telling this I realize I called even more than mentioned here. Can this company be counted on at all for help after you have purchased their product?
Has anyone else experienced this lack of concern? Any suggestions how to get their attention?
I've had my X100 for a couple of weeks now, and I love it more each time I use it. Handling seems natural, the electronic viewfinder is magic (Leica ought to do this), and the controls are all in the right places.
Image quality is superb. Colors are bright, details sharp and exposure is very smart. But I can over-ride the camera's setting just like my old Canon 7s.
The "quirk" of RAW being unavailable in the highest and lowest ISO simply indicates that those ISOs aren't available in the hardware and are made by under- or overexposing the RAW file and converting with the digital equivalent of push/pull in the camera's built-in JPEG engine. You can do exactly the same thing with a RAW converter, if you want. (Or perhaps better, just avoid those ISOs.)
@click2: I've had fine experiences with Fujifilm's repair centers in the US. Sorry to hear it's a problem in Canada.