|
 |
| Colorful
lady! To test
each scanner's overall image quality when
scanning color negative film, we chose this
colorful image with a fairly wide dynamic
range. We then adjusted each scanner's controls
to achieve the best possible scan, and if
supplied, we used color presets and profiles
to get the best color and contrast. Color
neg scanning really puts these units to
the test, since they must first remove the
orange film mask. |
You
may already have a turbo-charged computer, a super-sharp
monitor, digital darkroom software, and a printer
that produces photo-quality images that sing.
But there's one missing link: an affordable way
to get optimum quality scans from your film archives
into your computer. (If you're leaning toward
purchasing a digital camera and abandoning film
altogether, you're in for a rude awakening when
it comes to making big enlargements. )
However,
whether you're a film or digital fan, we've
got great news: The prices for high-resolution
desktop film scanners have fallen dramatically
in the last few years. For a few hundred to
several thousand dollars, you can get film scanners
that handle film sizes from APS up to medium
format (6x9). Scan times and other performance
parameters have improved significantly, and
so has output quality.
When
we did our last film scanner roundup two years
ago, the top 35mm units cost about $2,000, and
delivered up to 2820 pixels-per-inch (ppi) resolution,
36-bit color, and density ranges up to 3.0.
One of the scanners also featured a new technology
called Digital ICE (developed by Applied Science
Fiction) that automatically removes dust and
scratches from a negative or slide during scanning.
In the current scanner roundup, the lowest-priced
unit (only $799) features 2900 ppi res, 36-bit
color, a 3.4 density range, and Digital ICE3
(appropriately called Digital ICE cubed—see
sidebar on page 225). For a mere $1,799 you
can now get a 35mm scanner that features 4000
ppi res; and for about $3,000, you can pick
up a 35mm/medium-format scanner with 4,000 ppi
res, 48-bit color, a density range of 4.2, and
both SCSI and IEEE 1394 connections. Two years
ago that kind of scanning power would have set
you back ten grand!
FILM
OR FLATBED?
Readers often ask us, "Which is better, a flatbed
scanner with a transparency unit (TPU), or a
dedicated film scanner?" The answer really depends
on what you'll be scanning. A film scanner's
resolution, light source, and focusing system
are optimized for relatively small APS, 35mm,
or medium-format film originals. If you want
to scan prints or even 3-D art most of the time,
you should get a high-res flatbed scanner with
a TPU for occasional film scans. Until recently,
affordable flatbed scanners had relatively low
scanning resolution (600-800 ppi) that was inadequate
for film. Plus, few could focus sharply on film
placed on the scanning bed. Epson's new Expression
1680 (about $1,000 with a TPU) ups the quality
ante by featuring up to 1,600x3,200 ppi optical
res, 36-bit color, and a 3.4 density range.
At maximum res, this unit captures a 6,400x16,000-pixel
file—a whopping 307 MB of data-from a 4x5-inch
film original.
|
Check
out our tests on...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|